Withania somnifera (Indian ginseng) in diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of scientific evidence from experimental research to clinical application.
Authors not in graph record · peer-reviewed
What this paper studied
- Structured record only — no verified extractable findings
- Not evaluated; pending review. No finding has been extracted and verified for this record.
- Source status is not human clinical review.
This paper has no verified extractable findings. Only the structured record fields below are held; the remaining study fields are marked not available rather than inferred.
- What the paper set out to compare
- Not available in this record
- Who was studied
- adults with diabetes or elevated blood glucose
- How it was designed
- systematic review / meta-analysis
- Studied intervention
- not standardized across trials
- Compared against
- Not available in this record
- What was measured, and when
- Not available in this record
- What the authors reported
- Not available in this record
Fields marked not available are absent from this record; they have not been inferred from the title, the journal or any other bibliographic field.
Limitations and interpretation bounds
- Recorded risk of bias: moderate.
Source-linked brief with study context, limitations and exact record versions.
Withania somnifera (Indian ginseng) in diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of scientific evidence from experimental research to clinical application.
Substrate paper brief · PMID 31975514
Study publication year: Not available in this record. Retrieved: 2026-10-14T00:52:48.402Z.
https://evidencebased.info/studies/31975514
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31975514/
This is a dated public record snapshot. Check the canonical study page for later publication, withdrawal or review changes. It is not a recommendation or human clinical review.
What this paper studied
This paper has no verified extractable findings. Only the structured record fields below are held; the remaining study fields are marked not available rather than inferred.
- Not evaluated; pending review. No finding has been extracted and verified for this record.
- Source status is not human clinical review.
- What the paper set out to compare
- Not available in this record
- Who was studied
- adults with diabetes or elevated blood glucose
- How it was designed
- systematic review / meta-analysis
- Studied intervention
- not standardized across trials
- Compared against
- Not available in this record
- What was measured, and when
- Not available in this record
- What the authors reported
- Not available in this record
Fields marked not available are absent from this record; they have not been inferred from the title, the journal or any other bibliographic field.
No current verified extracted finding is available for this brief. Finding, paper and source version identifiers are not available here.
Study limitations and interpretation bounds
- Recorded risk of bias: moderate.
One finding, several views
Where these findings appear
No public finding destinations are listed for this record. Bibliographic metadata does not establish a finding, result or applicability.
Additional extraction and platform record details
These additional records are separate from the source-reported findings above. Platform estimates and grades are not results reported by this paper.
Study design and participants
From Substrate's structured claim record, not the source extraction above.
- Design
- systematic review / meta-analysis
- Sample size
- 9
- Population
- adults with diabetes or elevated blood glucose
- Intervention and protocol
- not standardized across trials
Results
- Ashwagandha → blood sugar: positive; effect size not reported.
Limitations, bias, and funding
Risk of bias: moderate
Funding: not reported
- Recorded risk of bias: moderate.
Role in the wider evidence
Existing platform assessment: grades and certainty are Substrate's own engine output for the wider claim, not results this paper reported.