COMPASS memory and attention measures
Source-reported context, pending human review. Membership uses registered source-bound placement rules, not equivalent clinical outcomes, personal suitability or a treatment recommendation.
Research question: What did the authors report in this source context, with their stated populations, comparisons and measurement windows?
Agreement, disagreement and a clinical recommendation are not established by these records. Different populations, interventions, routes, instruments and timepoints remain separate; no pooling is performed.
This filtered view rechecked source-context candidates for current publication and source integrity. Other papers were not evaluated; an empty result does not establish that research is absent. Browse the broader bounded research library.
Bounded to up to200 processed papers. Checked .
All topics · All public findings
- PMID 39498904: read the complete source record
measured outcome context. AI-extracted — pending human review. Not poolable. Finding version2; paper version3.
Authors’ record type: qualitative_direction. The entire source-specific finding context is retained.
One generalized p<.05 statement covers the listed three COMPASS items; no item-specific significance, effect sizes, confidence intervals, or exact p-values are given.; Other outcomes with baseline changes and reported safety are retained in inventory; the abstract does not clearly state between-group inferential comparisons for those outcomes.; The abstract describes participants as healthy subjects aged 30–75 years and separately as adults with self-reported cognitive and energy problems; the population field anchors the latter, and both descriptions are retained.; Authors report greater improvement from baseline with ARE versus placebo across the three COMPASS items, with one generalized p<0.05 statement for the bundle; do not assign significance separately to each item.