Training, detraining and retraining findings
- AI-extracted — pending human review
- Source-authored record; platform synthesis is not enabled for this record.
- Publication status: published.
Reported arm completers: CRT 22; PRT 20.
randomized parallel training sequences. 55 randomized participants. Analysis population: unclear.
That’s the gist — a fine place to stop. This describes the studied groups, not personal suitability.
Understand the result
The full source record is retained in words with its study context and uncertainty. No derived comparison or combined axis is added.
- Who & when
- randomized parallel training sequences. 55 randomized participants. Analysis population: unclear.
- Source
- PMID 39364857 · finding version 2
Each record retains its source-reported context and uncertainty.
Same finding version 2; paper version 3. Exact identity, status and limitations remain in this article.
Exact source-reported statements
randomized parallel training sequences. 55 randomized participants. Analysis population: unclear.
- Reported arm completers: CRT 22; PRT 20.
- leg press one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- leg press one repetition maximum — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- biceps curl one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- biceps curl one repetition maximum — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- countermovement jump height — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- countermovement jump height — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- leg press one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area)
- vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area)
- biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area)
Each record retains its source-reported context and uncertainty. No trial arms or new effect estimates are constructed.
Studied context
| Authors-reported finding | Reported arm completers: CRT 22; PRT 20. |
|---|---|
| Authors-reported finding | leg press one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference |
| Authors-reported finding | leg press one repetition maximum — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height) |
| Authors-reported finding | biceps curl one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference |
| Authors-reported finding | biceps curl one repetition maximum — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height) |
| Authors-reported finding | vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference |
| Authors-reported finding | vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height) |
| Authors-reported finding | biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference |
| Authors-reported finding | biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height) |
| Authors-reported finding | countermovement jump height — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference |
| Authors-reported finding | countermovement jump height — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height) |
| Authors-reported finding | leg press one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area) |
| Authors-reported finding | vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area) |
| Authors-reported finding | biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area) |
Limitations reported for this finding
- Authors-reported study comparisons and phases; no platform pooling.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
- Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes.
- No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority.
- No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed.
- Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests.
- The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred.
You can stop here, or inspect the evidence and its original sources.
- Reported arm completers: CRT 22; PRT 20.
- leg press one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- leg press one repetition maximum — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- biceps curl one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- biceps curl one repetition maximum — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- countermovement jump height — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference
- countermovement jump height — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height)
- leg press one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area)
- vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area)
- biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area)
randomized parallel training sequences. 55 randomized participants. Analysis population: unclear.
Source and extraction detail
- Finding revision
- finding:examine2025:39364857:1:v2
- Finding version
- 2
- Finding content hash
- sha256:6a10c441bd858c17ff9b87c4f4eebc5a0257747201fdd8879be541359878a0f9
- Paper version
- 3
- Paper version content hash
- sha256:2bdb127f3ee25c92a6bf1cb57b2a3eaeea3b9dddd26c082f3a18001ee72c7e56
- Source content hash
- sha256:c02eb924c0ded4a811423052557666500846d5fc5925ccab4f228919d8a868fb
- Extraction policy
- context164-source-topic-policy:d2c863b8d9f94acf3a7378bfa6e49a23bd72eea4408a689b542d3f7244fd7bfb
- Extraction policy hash
- sha256:d2c863b8d9f94acf3a7378bfa6e49a23bd72eea4408a689b542d3f7244fd7bfb
- Extraction method version
- source-reported-records/v1
- Field locators
- study_comparisons.clause0 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1706-1866
Source documents
- https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text — sha256:c02eb924c0ded4a811423052557666500846d5fc5925ccab4f228919d8a868fb (study_comparisons.clause0 → abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1 → abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2 → abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3 → abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4 → abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5 → abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6 → abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7 → abstract:1706-1866; study_comparisons.clause0 → abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1 → abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2 → abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3 → abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4 → abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5 → abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6 → abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7 → abstract:1706-1866; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 1; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 2; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 3; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 4; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 5; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 6; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 7; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 8; study_comparisons.clause0 → abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1 → abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2 → abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3 → abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4 → abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5 → abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6 → abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7 → abstract:1706-1866; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 1; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 2; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 3; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 4; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 5; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 6; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 7; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 8; study_comparisons.clause0 → abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1 → abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2 → abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3 → abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4 → abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5 → abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6 → abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7 → abstract:1706-1866; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 1; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 2; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 3; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 4; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 5; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 6; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 7; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 8; study_comparisons.clause0 → abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1 → abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2 → abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3 → abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4 → abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5 → abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6 → abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7 → abstract:1706-1866; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 1; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 2; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 3; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 4; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 5; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 6; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 7; sourceTopic.typedRole → Abstract, source context clause 8)
Read the full paper explanation
Optional audio and transcript
Audio reading
Read this exact transcript with an on-device browser voice. Checks the current public source version and starts only when you press Play; no audio provider or upload. Availability depends on this browser’s local voices.
Checking for a local voice…
Complete versioned transcript
Versioned snapshot of this displayed record. It may no longer be current; audio requires a successful current-version check.
Training, detraining and retraining findings Stable finding ID: finding:examine2025:39364857:1. Finding version: 2. Revision: finding:examine2025:39364857:1:v2. Content hash: sha256:6a10c441bd858c17ff9b87c4f4eebc5a0257747201fdd8879be541359878a0f9. Paper version: 3. Paper content hash: sha256:2bdb127f3ee25c92a6bf1cb57b2a3eaeea3b9dddd26c082f3a18001ee72c7e56. AI-extracted — pending human review Source-authored record; platform synthesis is not enabled for this record. Publication status: published. Reported arm completers: CRT 22; PRT 20. randomized parallel training sequences. 55 randomized participants. Analysis population: unclear. Authors-reported finding: Reported arm completers: CRT 22; PRT 20.. Authors-reported finding: leg press one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference. Authors-reported finding: leg press one repetition maximum — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height). Authors-reported finding: biceps curl one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference. Authors-reported finding: biceps curl one repetition maximum — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height). Authors-reported finding: vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference. Authors-reported finding: vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height). Authors-reported finding: biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference. Authors-reported finding: biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height). Authors-reported finding: countermovement jump height — PRT versus CRT; postintervention authors-named postintervention window. No detected between-group difference. Authors-reported finding: countermovement jump height — Within PRT during the named phase; 10-week detraining period in PRT after the first 10-week resistance-training period. Decrease within the stated arm and phase. Source reported p < 0.05 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, biceps curl one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area, countermovement jump height). Authors-reported finding: leg press one repetition maximum — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area). Authors-reported finding: vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area). Authors-reported finding: biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area — PRT versus CRT; first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining. Compared phases: PRT first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT start of retraining after detraining; CRT Weeks 10-15 of CRT authors-named CRT phase. Greater in the stated experimental group at the compared phases. Source reported p < 0.01 for the outcome bundle (leg press one repetition maximum, vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area). Each record retains its source-reported context and uncertainty. Reported limitation: Authors-reported study comparisons and phases; no platform pooling. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Within-arm change during detraining; not a randomized between-group effect. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Reported limitation: Completer counts are not randomized arm sizes. Reported limitation: No detected difference is not equivalence or noninferiority. Reported limitation: No numerical effect estimate or cross-phase contrast is computed. Reported limitation: Threshold p values belong to the source-reported outcome bundle, not independently asserted outcome tests. Reported limitation: The abstract reports no between-group differences and similar postintervention adaptations; no endpoint-specific test or equivalence is inferred. Finding revision: finding:examine2025:39364857:1:v2. Finding version: 2. Finding content hash: sha256:6a10c441bd858c17ff9b87c4f4eebc5a0257747201fdd8879be541359878a0f9. Paper version: 3. Paper version content hash: sha256:2bdb127f3ee25c92a6bf1cb57b2a3eaeea3b9dddd26c082f3a18001ee72c7e56. Source content hash: sha256:c02eb924c0ded4a811423052557666500846d5fc5925ccab4f228919d8a868fb. Extraction policy: context164-source-topic-policy:d2c863b8d9f94acf3a7378bfa6e49a23bd72eea4408a689b542d3f7244fd7bfb. Extraction policy hash: sha256:d2c863b8d9f94acf3a7378bfa6e49a23bd72eea4408a689b542d3f7244fd7bfb. Extraction method version: source-reported-records/v1. Field locators: study_comparisons.clause0 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7 → https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text: abstract:1706-1866. Source document: https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39364857&rettype=abstract&retmode=text. Source hash: sha256:c02eb924c0ded4a811423052557666500846d5fc5925ccab4f228919d8a868fb. Locators: study_comparisons.clause0: abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1: abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2: abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3: abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4: abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5: abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6: abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7: abstract:1706-1866; study_comparisons.clause0: abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1: abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2: abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3: abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4: abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5: abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6: abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7: abstract:1706-1866; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 1; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 2; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 3; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 4; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 5; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 6; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 7; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 8; study_comparisons.clause0: abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1: abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2: abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3: abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4: abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5: abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6: abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7: abstract:1706-1866; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 1; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 2; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 3; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 4; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 5; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 6; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 7; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 8; study_comparisons.clause0: abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1: abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2: abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3: abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4: abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5: abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6: abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7: abstract:1706-1866; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 1; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 2; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 3; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 4; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 5; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 6; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 7; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 8; study_comparisons.clause0: abstract:624-829; study_comparisons.clause1: abstract:830-914; study_comparisons.clause2: abstract:915-973; study_comparisons.clause3: abstract:1034-1326; study_comparisons.clause4: abstract:1327-1451; study_comparisons.clause5: abstract:1452-1550; study_comparisons.clause6: abstract:1551-1705; study_comparisons.clause7: abstract:1706-1866; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 1; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 2; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 3; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 4; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 5; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 6; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 7; sourceTopic.typedRole: Abstract, source context clause 8. Canonical paper: /studies/39364857. This is a reading of this version, not a clinical recommendation. Check the current paper page for updates.
Read the full paper explanation →Original source · Bring into My Profile